To me, the mere thought of electric cars is rather depressing on a personal level. Yes, I do see the bigger picture as far as the overall advantages of electric cars go, but nothing gets me more excited than the roar of a V8, the vibration of a big engine block and the sound of closed body compressor surge from a T66. Now, Tesla introduced the Model S, which I'll admit, is rather a pretty design as far as electric cars go, and to my surprise can reach 0 to 100kmh in just 2.3 seconds... with making no more sound than your microwave.
Right now, they make up just one percent of the global automobile market. But sales jumped 36 percent last year, to 750 000 worldwide, and China, the world's largest car market, is betting big on electric. In September, Beijing announced it plans to completely ban the sale of gas and diesel vehicles at some future, unannounced date, while India, Britain, France, and other countries have set their own 2030 or 2040 deadlines. U.S. automakers are now racing to get a piece of the emerging electric market. GM and Ford have promised to roll out a combined total of more than 30 electric models by 2023. Volvo will introduce only battery-powered or hybrid models starting in 2019.
The range and speed of electric vehicles are constantly improving; when their up-front sales price finally matches a conventional car's, "that's when the real shift occurs," says Colin McKerracher, head of advanced transport analysis at Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
It's partly thanks to Tesla, whose luxury Model S transformed the image of electric cars from sluggish, small, and boxy vehicles to sleek, powerful machines. One version of the Model S can go from 0 to 100kph in 2.28 seconds – quicker than a Ferrari.
But, the most important factor has been the major advances in lithium-ion batteries, whose cost plunged from $1,000 per kilowatt-hour in 2010 to $300 today. As a result, automakers have been able to develop several mass-market options that, after subsidies, are less than the median U.S. car price of $34 968. Tesla has already received 400 000 pre-orders for its mass-market Model 3, which starts at $36 200; the Chevy Bolt and Nissan Leaf start at $37 495 and $30 680, respectively.
Still, "people don't buy cars based solely on the price tag," says Sam Ori, executive director of the University of Chicago's Energy Policy Institute – and a number of other obstacles remain. What is the defining factor of purchasing cars in any case? It's a very personal thing. Its much like fashion or taste in music fused together with a bit of practicality. I have friends that prefer bakkies (pick-up trucks) and others, like myself, a nippy hatchback.
The biggest issue with convincing people to go electric is "range anxiety." Car buyers still worry that an electric car could run out of battery juice during a long journey, leaving them stranded. In fact, while early electric car models needed a recharge every 160km or so, today's electric cars have a range of between 320 and 530km – close to that of your conventional fuel tank. That covers 87 percent of an average person's driving needs, according to one study. But consumers remain nervous. They tend to set their requirement based on their worst-case specification.
Automakers also have to contend with "charging-time trauma." Electric car drivers who choose to charge their car at home through a regular 220-volt wall plug can do so for as little as R10 for a full battery – but they will often have to wait up to 10 hours for a complete recharge. Or they can go for a "fast charge" at a public charging station. The U.S. has 43,000; China is planning to extend its 150,000 existing spots to 4.8 million by 2020.
Those public charging points, many of them free, use 240-volt and 480-volt chargers that drop the re-juice time to 20 or 30 minutes. Charge times are constantly falling, and cities are pouring money into charging infrastructure, just as lawmakers have heavily subsidised the cars themselves.
In the U.S, for example, a federal rebate program gives electric vehicle buyers a $7 500 tax credit for the first 200 000 vehicles a carmaker delivers. States offer their own generous goodies on top of that, including tax credits, free parking spots, and preferential highway lanes.
China and Denmark give motorists a 23 percent and 49 percent discount on electric cars, respectively. These subsidies are crucial to the survival of the electric car market; even with the plunge in prices, lithium-ion batteries still add about $20 000 to the cost of an electric car, making plug-ins unaffordable without rebates and tax credits. But electric car proponents think they have two big factors on their side: China and basic economics.
The Chinese government is doubling down on electric, not just to reduce the choking smog blanketing its cities but also to help its car manufacturers seize control of the global automobile market. Those manufacturers have already developed 100 electric models, leaving other nations' automakers in the dust.
Even without Beijing's push, many analysts believe that electric cars have the winning economic formula – so much so that researchers at Bloomberg New Energy Finance estimate plug-ins will make up the majority of cars worldwide by 2040. Electric vehicles (EVs) have fewer than 20 moving parts, as opposed to 2 000 in combustion engines, and thus require less maintenance. Their fuel costs are much lower. When up-front prices finally drop to below those of gas-guzzlers the rational economic choice will be to buy the EV.
Every self-respecting environmentalist drives a hybrid or a plug-in. But these vehicles may not be as low-emission as many proud owners believe. While all-electrics produce zero emissions on the road, their batteries get their juice from power plants – many of which generate electricity by burning the dirtiest fuel of all, coal.
By way of comparison, gas-powered cars produce an average of 411 grams of carbon dioxide per mile. In California, which has a high proportion of "clean electricity" from solar or wind power, an electric car produces 100 grams of greenhouse gas pollution per mile. If you're recharging in Minnesota, though, where most of the electricity is coal-generated, that figure rises to 300 grams.
As power plants get cleaner in the future, thanks to the continuing decline in coal-fired plants and to carbon capture and other technologies, it's more logical to focus on the source of the problem, says Qin Lihong, president of electric automaker NextEV. "It's much easier for society to make hundreds of power plants better," says Qin, "than change the hundreds of millions of cars in thousands of cities.
So it seems as if EVs are here to stay and become a part of our daily lives. What does this mean for true automotive enthusiasts? As odd as it may seem, I personally don't see it negatively affecting car culture in a big way, it might change quite a few things though.
There was a time whereby cars of today were considered concepts, especially with the idea of onboard computers doing most of the work but, in the end, it worked out even better. For example, back in 2005 when the Nissan GTR R35 was slowly becoming the most anticipated concept of all time, was lead to believe that it was designed to be unmodifiable. And look at today.
What do you think is the future of the automobile? Leave us a comment below.